Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- hunter:sessions:8.1 [2026/06/28 11:58] – emilia_the_wolf
+++ hunter:sessions:8.1 [2026/06/28 12:08] (current) – emilia_the_wolf
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 //
-Vampires 'feed' by drinking the blood of either humans, or animals. It appears that most vampires either enjoy or find easier the drinking of the blood of humans.
+Vampires 'feed' by drinking the blood of either humans, or animals ((Camera Flash (2026). An interview at Night - Redacted Transcript. Norfolk Defence League Publications. p. 3.)). It appears that most vampires either enjoy or find easier the drinking of the blood of humans.
 //
@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 //
-Many vampires will claim that, although they consume blood from humans, that they are 'Consentualists'. Consentualism is defined by vampire society as 'Feeding upon those who consent to be fed upon', and the revelation of such feeding habits acts as a way to dismiss the notion of a 'ravenous bloodsucker' who 'drains people dry'. I will argue here that this is nothing more than a manipulation tactic, both towards humans to lull them into a false sense of security and more notably towards the vampire to trick them that they are anything else than a parasite preying on humans who don't know what vampires actually are. From all my observations, I will distil this argument into a few points;
+Many vampires will claim that, although they consume blood from humans, that they are 'Consentualists'. Consentualism is defined by vampire society as 'Feeding upon those who consent to be fed upon', and the revelation of such feeding habits acts as a way to dismiss the notion of a 'ravenous bloodsucker' who 'drains people dry'. I will argue here that this is nothing more than a manipulation tactic, both towards humans to lull them into a false sense of security and more notably towards the vampire to trick them that they are anything else than a parasite preying on humans who don't know what vampires actually are. From all my observations, I will distil this argument into a few points; //
-  - Ordered List Item
+  - //Vampires can choose to drink blood from animals but few do. Although animals are not able to give consent, the vast amount of animal blood produced by modern husbandry could sate every vampire on earth, without involving a single unknowing human//
-//
+  - //The act of drinking blood puts the victim in danger, and the risks of such is not explained to them before any act takes place//
+  - //It appears that the act of 'feeding' puts a victim in a trance, almost drug-like, state. This state possibly appears to be almost euphoric and thus possibly has addictive potential.//
+  - // The victim does not seem to remember hours before or after the event, any possible regret and disgust will not be remembered and therefore cannot inform their consent. //
+  - // A few of these events involved tricking or deceiving the victim into leaving a safe area and moving to an isolated area. //
+  - // And finally, most damningly, none of the victims seem to be aware it is a vampire that is preying on them, and none of them had been asked for their consent before being 'fed' on.//